The Bakers Union Launches Important Campaign at Amazon.com to Fight for Workers Rights

Working for mammoth corporations like Amazon is an unfortunate necessity of life for many workers. Profits and working conditions for the bosses are generous to say the least, while the opposite is true for Amazon’s countless thousands of employees.

Business is booming, and an article in the Financial Times made this absolutely clear: “In 1996, Amazon had $15.8m of net sales. For 2016, that amount was $136bn.” But tragically a similar improvement in basic work place rights has not been forthcoming, which owes much to Amazons longstanding and well-documented opposition to trade unions.

Financial Times and Amazon

In their latest Annual Report, Amazon autocrat Jeff Bezos admits that “Our Employees… will continue to be, the single most important element of Amazon.com’s success… We are incredibly fortunate to have this group of dedicated employees whose sacrifices and passion build Amazon.com.”

Managers are well aware that their own profits are all derived from their staff’s hard work, but this doesn’t mean they feel obliged to treat their staff fairly.

Customers’ needs, however, always come before the needs of their employees, thus Bezos writes: “It’s not easy to work here (when I interview people I tell them, ‘You can work long, hard, or smart, but at Amazon.com you can’t choose two out of three’)…” The least his workers deserve in response is a real living wage, something that Amazon is adamant they cannot afford?!

Amazon still

Workers not only continue to struggle to live on low pay, but they are also treated with contempt, like modern-day slaves. Amazon workers must struggle to meet unreasonable targets to maintain their bosses’ profits and are then, when they become ill from working so hard, they are punished for not coming to work. And all this coming from a corporation that in 2013 received more money in grants from the British government than it paid in tax!

The only way that workers can turn-around this abominable situation is by organising together to ensure they have a collective voice against their very well-organised bosses. This process is presently being given a helping hand by the Bakers Food and Allied Workers Union (BFAWU) who are focusing their decades of organising experience in making sure Amazon workers have a loud voice in their workplace that the bosses will no longer be able to ignore.

As the Bakers Union explain in their just-released “Organising Amazon” video, without representation in the workplace, workers leave themselves open to exploitation. Without union representation the individual voices of workers will simply not be heard on critically important issues like fair pay, the setting of reasonable working hours, and the nature of holiday and sick leave.

“Together we’re stronger,” they point out, and the more people who join the Baker Union, the “louder your voice gets” which enables workers to be in a better position “to negotiate terms and conditions” and have a “greater the impact… on Amazon’s decision-making.”

“Your voice can and must be heard,” the union emphasises, as how else can workers stand united (with the assistance of experienced union representatives) in opposing workplace inequality and in striving to eliminate bullying and discrimination of all forms.

Ongoing efforts to unionise Amazon will need to be both national and international in scope, and the Bakers Union is certainly up to the task. For example, in recent years the Bakers Union have led successful campaigns against the use of zero-hours contracts in the food industry, and supported the successful campaign for a $15 an hour living wage in America.

This is why the union believes there is no time like the present to act:  “Now’s the time to join your union and to get your fellow workers to join too.”

For further details contact the Bakers Union www.bfawu.org by:

  • calling 0121 237 3720
  • emailing region3@bfawu.org
  • or contacting George Atwall on 07739 326 009

Open University Facing Huge Cuts: Fight for free education

The Open University has announced a technological overhaul, which will involve making £100 million of cuts, nearly a quarter of its £425 million budget. The consequences of this ‘streamlining’ will inevitably be job losses, and the closure of courses that are not considered profitable enough.

This is despite significant fee hikes. A module which would have cost £700 in 2012 now costs £2,864! The result of such prohibitively high fees has been a drop in the number of part-time students, which has fallen by a third since 2010.

A vicious cycle is now occurring, where the fall in student numbers is being used as an excuse to make cuts and axe jobs, which in turn results in reduced access to education for adult learners.

socialist students

In justifying these ‘savings’ Peter Horrocks, the vice chancellor (who commands an annual salary of £235,000), claimed: “We were disruptive and revolutionary in our use of technology in 1969 and, as we approach our 50th year, we intend to be disruptive and revolutionary again…”! It certainly will be disruptive; to the staff who face uncertainty for their jobs, and to students whose subjects may be culled.

Jeremy Corbyn pledged to make education free. When interviewed by NME magazine he said: “The Open University is the most incredible institution we have, one of the best in this country. I think it’s absolutely fantastic and I want to properly fund the Open University as I want to make sure that other adult education colleges are properly funded.”

The prospect of accumulating crippling debt is a big deterrent for working class people wishing to continue studying beyond school. Jeremy Corbyn is right that education should be free and accessible for everybody, regardless of age and background – not just for the privileged few.

Leicestershire Police Have Just Demanded an End to Further Funding Cuts

Our current Tory “government” is weak and divided and so now is the perfect time for us all to unite and fight back against yet more proposed cuts to our public services. Given that the police force has already seen massive funding cuts under Tory rule, with a loss of around 20,000 police officers since 2010, it is not too surprising that they would be quick to speak out against further Tory cuts.

(Government figures show that in March 2010, the total number of police officers in England and Wales was 143,734, while by March 2016, that figure had fallen to 124,066.)

Monday’s issue of the Leicester Mercury (June 12) thus carries the article “Chief urges MPs to fight for fair funding for Leicestershire Police.” Therein we find that Leicestershire’s chief constable Simon Cole “is to write to the 10 new Parliamentary representatives to warn he expects his force to lose a further £10 million under existing Conservative spending plans.” This is an additional cut on top of the £38 million that has already been removed from the local police forces operating budget since 2009.

cole

In response to the publication of the Mercury article, one member of the public took to twitter to ask the chief constable “how come you have to make more cuts despite the Government saying funding is protected?” Mr Cole quickly responded by tweeting “Because it doesn’t cascade to local forces” and by also linking to a Guardian article from last year titled “George Osborne rebuked for ‘no cuts in police budgets’ claim” (10 March 2016).

The Guardian article is very informative in relation to the highly misleading statements made by Theresa May during her failed snap general election campaign, where she repeatedly talked about providing record levels of funding for public services despite these representing real-terms funding cuts. This is because the 2016 article takes both George Osborne and the then home secretary, Theresa May, to task for deceiving the public. The article notes:

“George Osborne, has been rebuked by the statistics watchdog for wrongly claiming there would be “no cuts at all in police budgets” in his autumn statement last November.

“The chancellor’s declaration that “now is not the time for further police cuts, now is the time to back our police” was widely regarded as his major “rabbit out of a hat” surprise at a time when cuts of up to 20% had been expected.

“But Sir Andrew Dilnot, the chair of the UK Statistics Authority, ruled that despite Osborne’s claim to be providing “real-terms protection” for the police, forces actually faced a £160m real-terms cut in their Whitehall funding in 2015-16 and 2016-17.”

In the wake of May’s shambolic election results, Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell have already called on May to resign and have pledged to put their programme to parliament.

So now it is vital that all public service providers facing swingeing Tory cuts take a leaf out of the police force’s book and raise the need for politicians who are willing to oppose austerity and thereby increase, not cut, funding for all vital public services.

Join our public meeting on Thursday night, 7.30pm “Tories in Tatters, Fight for Socialism!” — June 15, upstairs at the Barley Mow pub on Granby Street in Leicester. https://www.facebook.com/events/1575345832478624/?acontext=%7B%22ref%22%3A%2222%22%2C%22feed_story_type%22%3A%2222%22%2C%22action_history%22%3A%22null%22%7D&pnref=story

“Let’s hope that June is the end of May.”

GUEST POST: This following letter was authored by one of Leicester’s former TUSC councillors, Wayne Naylor, and was sent to the Leicester Mercury mailbox in late May and was not published by the newspaper.

Corbyn speaking in Gateshead

 

As the election comes closer and politics is ever more in turmoil, it’s worth looking at why changes happen.

Previously, myself and many others promoted the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) an alternative to Labour. But TUSC took the decision not to put up Parliamentary Candidates for this General Election so as not to oppose Jeremy Corbyn.

For all the internal problems with the Labour Party, to wake up on June 9th to five more years of the Conservatives would be a disaster. For people like me with health issues, for people with disabilities, for those struggling to find real work and those supported by benefits for whatever reason, the future of lives really are at stake.

With people’s needs always being considered secondary to business and financial security, there has never been a more important time in this country for Socialism than now. Something is wrong when even families in work cannot afford to live.

Under Tory misrule, Brexit, which was the people’s democratic choice is being shambolically carried through by a party trying to get “the best out of it” for the 1% highest earners, not the 99% of real people who will suffer for their meddling.

Jeremy Corbyn offers hope to many people, who stands by people trying to get out of poverty, seeing the need for real change not hollow promises. With massive popular support, the Labour Party’s internal problems could be remedied if Jeremy Corbyn becomes Prime Minister. Those Labour councillors and MPs that are still condemning him will have two choices, accept that the country wants him as Leader and shut up, or go their own way.

Let’s hope that June is the end of May. A vote for Corbyn will be a vote for ourselves, our families, our friends and our communities. We must fight on to make sure that the Labour Party grows in strength under Corbyn’s strong and democratic leadership and becomes the true party of the people.

Wayne Naylor — Leicester Independent Councillors Against Cuts (TUSC)

Death by a Thousand Cuts: Disability in the Age of Austerity and Why Corbyn Must Win

This article has been written by an anonymous Socialist Party member

It isn’t news to anyone that the Tory government, and the previous coalition, have ruthlessly attacked the disabled in this country. The Tories continue to put the ‘n’ in cuts as support structures and welfare are stripped away from the most vulnerable in our society. Increased pressure on the disabled has led to multiple suicides, desperation, and increased reliance upon foodbanks and precarious contracts.

This article is titled ‘death by a thousand cuts’ as it is the cumulative effect of all the cuts and pressures that have led to the deaths of many disabled people. The austerity agenda, which creates far more debt than it will ever reduce, is a purely ideological attack, carried out by the wealthiest in our society against its poorest.

Poverty impacts the disabled disproportionately; in 2012/13 “24% of disabled people were living in poverty compared with 18% of those who were not disabled”. The Equality and Human Rights Commission, in their response to the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of disabled people, was particularly telling. The EHRC stated:

“The Welfare Reform Act 2012 introduced reforms to the social security system in England, Scotland and Wales, which were implemented at the same time as reductions in local government budgets for adult social care. Local authorities’ total spending on adult social care fell 8% in real terms between 2010-11 and 2012-13 and is projected to continue falling.”

Furthermore, the creation of Personal Independence Payment, which replaces Disability Living Allowance, is likely to result in a loss of income for many disabled people. Six hundred thousand people who were entitled to DLA will not be eligible for PIP.

DLA money is used by the disabled to increase their independence paying for aids in the home, carers, extra transport costs, and Motability vehicles. These vehicles, which cost thousands to adapt for the disabled are increasingly being removed from people, severely limiting their independence, and also their ability to get to work.

injustice-anywhere_ADA

In one notable case a disabled person had her PIP money reduced, and so her car was removed from her, but a welfare to work programme then paid far more money to get her to work in a taxi. It is clear from just this one example that the government has very little foresight when it comes to supporting those who can work, and want to work.

It is important to make clear at this point that a great deal of medical evidence has to be provided to claim PIP. Increasingly the expert advice of GPs, specialist nurses and consultants is disregarded as more weight is placed on the short assessments carried out by so called medical specialists. This is particularly stark when making an application for Employment and Support Allowance; a benefit designed for those who are largely unable to work. In order to make a claim for this benefit you need a sick note, now renamed fit notes, which state you are unable to work. These are provided by people who know you and treat you and so know whether you are capable of work.

Support groups now inundated with desperate pleas for help

At my work capability assessment I was asked why I hadn’t killed myself by a nurse with no background in mental health nursing (I know this because I looked him up on the NMC). The assessment took twenty minutes and due to my anxiety I shut down, trembling, crying, sweating and nauseated, knowing that my financial security was in the hands of this complete stranger. When I told him that my mental health had deteriorated since the sudden death of my partner, that he had collapsed in front of me, and took his last breath, the nurse stated that he knew how I felt because he was there when his Mum died. I felt broken.

Although this is only my personal experience this is far from uncommon. Support groups for the disabled are inundated with desperate pleas for help from thousands of people who have found themselves in similar situations. This is despite huge funding cuts to these groups from government budgets.

After I was given zero points and declared fit for work I then had to claim Jobseekers Allowance. My work coach was completely unsympathetic to my health problems and forced me to attend daily group information sessions in a crowded room. This made me far more ill.

I asked for the DWP to look at the decision again, a process called Mandatory Reconsideration, and they agreed with the initial decision maker. This is hardly surprising considering that the DWP has a target of failing 80% of mandatory reconsiderations. The current rejection rate is 87% despite a success rate for claimants of 64% at tribunal. The added pressure of financial insecurity, when people are already battling their health problems and disabilities, is nothing other than an act of ruthless cruelty. Between 2011 and 2014 two thousand three hundred and eighty people died within six weeks of being found fit for work.

As disabled people suffer increasing financial pressures they are also disproportionately affected by cuts to the NHS. With 24 A&E departments set to close if the Tories are re-elected this will only get worse. Cuts to child and adolescent mental health services, bereavement charities, and adult mental health services are compounding problems.

When I advised my therapist that my mental health issues were becoming more acute she emailed me a phone number for The Samaritans and the number for a crisis team. This isn’t because she doesn’t care but because therapists working for the NHS, unsurprisingly, are under huge amounts of pressure.

Support for the mentally ill is increasingly put on the charitable sector including for veterans affected by PTSD and associated mental health difficulties. The NHS is being pushed to breaking point in order for private healthcare companies to move in on the NHS and fully privatise it.

Prior to the conservative government Education Health and Care Plans were paid for from NHS budgets. These are plans that are there to support disabled children in order to get the most out of their education. This now, in part, comes out of already severely stretched local authority funding.

It is thus harder for children to get the support that they need at school despite huge advances in pedagogical training for trainee teachers educating disabled children. It is interesting to note that companies with links to the Tories have won £1.5 billion pounds worth of contracts and Unite research found that 24 MPs and peers who backed so called health reforms have links to 15 private healthcare companies. It is also no secret that these companies contribute to Tory campaign funding. The Tories will always represent the wealthiest and their selfish interests. The average donation to them in the last few weeks is £60,000 compared to an average donation of £22 to the Labour Party.

However this is not to say that the Labour Party have clean hands when it comes to poor treatment of the disabled. It was them that instituted the Work Capability Assessment and very little was done while they were in power to reduce stigma towards the disabled. It is also clear though that only a Labour win will result in any relief from the dire circumstances many disabled people find themselves in.

A failure to force companies to make reasonable adjustments in the workplace mean that many disabled people who are perfectly capable of working find themselves unemployed. Of course within a capitalist system it is often not financially beneficial to companies to make adjustments for the disabled and as long as our economy is run to the benefit of capitalism inequality and poverty will only increase.

Manifesto promises that benefit the disabled

I will now turn to the Labour manifesto promises which will benefit the disabled. There are twelve million disabled people in this country, a huge percentage of the electorate, who will benefit from a Corbyn win.

A promise to repeal the hated bedroom tax, which has led to evictions of disabled people from their adapted homes, is a welcome measure. As is the commitment to parity of esteem for mental health issues with physical health. This is a promise also made recently by Theresa May, a statement by a woman with such a dreadful record that it would be laughable if it wasn’t so tragic.

Labour have also committed to an integration of health and social care, to offer disabled people a personal care plan, the option of personal budgets where appropriate, and a single named person to coordinate care. This last commitment is far more important than it initially appears. A common barrier to improving health is a lack of communication between various specialists. A single point of reference enables joint up thinking and improved health outcomes.

Labour have also vowed to overhaul the Work Capability Assessment, a barbaric process which deters people from claiming money that they are entitled to. They have also pledged to toughen up the law on disability hate crime although it is my personal belief that until the right wing media stops its demonization of the disabled then education rather than tougher sentencing is the key to reducing hate crime. They have also promised to listen more to disabled people and invite disabled people to sit on the cross-government committee that develops disability policy. It is remarkable, but sadly not unsurprising, that this isn’t already the case.

All of these commitments are impressive and seriously needed but until I did my research I had no idea about most of them. It is clear then that one of our aims as the Socialist Party must be to reach out to disabled people, inform them what Corbyn will do for them, and ultimately how socialism will drastically improve their quality of life. The message is not getting out enough. As previously mentioned there are twelve million disabled people in this country and they could have a huge impact upon the election. We must agitate, educate, and organise, that old-fashioned, but still relevant maxim.

Electing Corbyn is the start

Corbyn must be elected to prevent further privatisation of the NHS, to review and improve disability benefits, and to improve quality of life for the many not the few. However we must also look at the disabled with a long term view. Electing Corbyn is only a start and fundamentally until the working class and the disabled are organised, unionised, and enfranchised, we will continue to exist within a perpetual capitalist crisis.

As Marx himself stated within any economic system is the seed of its own downfall. That is shown by the failure of the capitalist class to work for the poor and disenfranchised and a refusal to listen or care. In conclusion I return to my title ‘death by a thousand cuts’. It is the cumulative impact of cuts across the board that exacerbate existing health problems, drive people to suicide, and exhaust the disabled. Real lasting benefits can only arise from serious social and economic change. In 2015 there were 30,000 ‘excess’ deaths according to The Royal Society of Medicine due to disinvestment in health and social care. This needs remedying. Capitalism is not the answer.

In their book The New Politics of Disablement Michael Oliver and Colin Barnes argue that since the first edition of their book their optimism has waned regarding hope for the future of the disability rights movement. They argue that there is “little prospect of transforming capitalism in the foreseeable future”. However, I believe that this is a needlessly pessimistic view and it is often in times of great struggle that hugely transformative social movements arise. I contend that capitalism needs to be replaced rather than transformed. They do however conclude that quote they “still believe that the only long-term political strategy for disabled people is to be part of a far wider struggle to create a better society for all”. They foresee an end to disability oppression only “when the oppression of all is overcome and that will only happen with major structural, economic, political, and cultural transformation as well as resistance”. With this I wholeheartedly agree..